An SEC cybersecurity examination is not a test you can study for in the two weeks between the notice and the document deadline. By the time the request list lands, the examiner is asking for records that were supposed to exist throughout the year. Either the firm has them — dated and consistent — or it is assembling them under a clock. And assembled-under-a-clock is exactly what an examiner is trained to recognize.
The Division of Examinations does not examine cybersecurity as a standalone subject. It examines whether your cybersecurity program satisfies the obligations you already carry as a registered adviser. Cybersecurity is the lens; these rules are the substance.
Full detail on each: Cybersecurity Regulations Reference →
When the staff asks about cybersecurity, the right answer is a folder, not a conversation. The recurring categories include the written information security policy, the incident response plan, evidence of the annual review, the vendor inventory and due-diligence files, access-control and MFA records, training records, and any incident documentation from the review period. The firms that struggle are not the ones missing a policy — almost everyone has a policy. They are the ones who cannot produce the evidence that the policy was followed in practice.
What an SEC Examiner Actually Asks For: The Cybersecurity Document Request List →
If answering "when was this last reviewed, and what changed?" requires a phone call to the MSP, the program is paper-only — and an examiner will find that out.
Exam readiness is the product of an assessment plus a year of maintained evidence. The Cyber Risk & Vulnerability Threat Assessment (CRVT) is the flagship one-time engagement: external attack surface mapping, internal vulnerability scanning, a Microsoft 365 / Azure configuration audit, OSINT and breach-exposure analysis, and a policy review — combined into a single examination-ready report with regulatory mapping, an evidence archive, and a remediation roadmap.
What a Cyber Risk Vulnerability Threat Assessment Actually Involves →
For firms that want the file kept current year-round rather than rebuilt before each exam, the Cyber Compliance Consultant and Remote CISO engagements maintain the program on an annual cadence.
Typically a matter of weeks from the examination notice. The practical point is that the records are expected to have existed throughout the review period, not to be created in response to the request — examiners are trained to recognize documentation generated to satisfy a request rather than to run the firm.
Commonly the written information security policy, the incident response plan, evidence of the annual Rule 206(4)-7 review, the vendor inventory and due-diligence files, access-control and MFA records, training records, and any incident documentation from the review period.
Programs that exist on paper but cannot produce evidence the controls were actually in force. Most firms have a policy; far fewer can show dated reviews, configuration baselines and drift reports, incident logs, and completed vendor due diligence that prove the policy was followed in practice.
An exam notice, an insurance renewal, a custodian attestation — every engagement starts with a real trigger. The first call is twenty minutes and there is no obligation on either side.
Click here to start a conversation →